Protein Purification with SMBC
| The Instrument
The Semba Octave™ Chromatography System is an automated liquid chromatography instrument designed for purification of high-value chemical and biological compounds... |
[−] |
| The SMBC Process Simulated moving bed chromatography (SMBC) is a powerful approach to chromatographic protein fractionation... |
[−] |
The zones are defined as follows (Perrin and Nicoud, 2001):
Zone 1: Between Desorbent inlet and Extract outlet; where the more retained component is desorbed Zone 2: Between Extract outlet and Feed inlet; where the less retained component is desorbed and the more retained component is enriched Zone 3: Between the Feed inlet and Raffinate outlet; where the more retained component is adsorbed and the less retained component is enriched and desorbed
| Application to Protein Purification
The counter-current flow of mobile and solid phases in SMBC allows highly efficient use of chromatography resin and substantially increased resolution of target protein from other proteins with similar, but not identical, chromatographic properties... |
[−] |
In the IMAC application the feed is a bacterial cell lysate containing a histidine-tagged recombinant protein that has been overexpressed using standard molecular biology methods. In this case the sample (Feed) is treated as a binary mixture in which the tagged protein is the more retained component (Extract) and all other untagged proteins and unwanted cellular components are the less retained component (Raffinate). The recombinant protein is expressed from a plasmid that encodes a small peptide consisting of 6-10 consecutive histidine residues, which becomes incorporated into the protein. This “histidine tag” confers the resulting fusion protein with an affinity for metals such as nickel and cobalt. Solid phase resins containing chelated metal ions (usually nickel) can be used to purify the histidine-tagged proteins from crude samples such as bacterial lysates by IMAC. In a typical process a crude sample is passed through a nickel-chelate resin under conditions where the histidine-tagged target protein binds to the immobilized nickel. Untagged bacterial proteins are washed away, and then the purified target protein is released from the solid phase by increasing the concentration of imidazole, a small molecule which competes with the histidine tag for the metal binding sites on the resin.
Semba Biosciences has applied IMAC to SMBC for protein purification using two different methods; Isocratic Mode and Step Mode. In Isocratic Mode (patent-pending), a single imidazole concentration is used throughout the system. The chosen concentration is high enough to cause the histidine-tagged target protein to move through the solid phase but still low enough for it to be preferentially retained relative to the untagged or weakly binding proteins. This method, which may also be applied to other protein affinity systems, is analogous to “classical” SMBC, and takes advantage of the resolving power of SMBC to produce extremely high purity with the convenience of a single buffer system.
In contrast to Isocratic Mode, the Step Mode uses multiple solvents and establishes four independent zones for binding, washing, elution, and regeneration steps analogous to conventional batch chromatography protocols, but operated in a continuous cycle.
Figure 2, below, shows a schematic diagram of an 8-column Step SMBC configuration at equilibrium, at two arbitrary positions in the cycle.
The main advantage of this method is the ability to achieve high recovery and concentration of target proteins, and it is especially useful when working with dilute samples. As in Isocratic Mode, “column switching” is actually performed by simultaneously switching all fluid streams one column forward at defined intervals, which has the effect of “moving” the solid phase in the opposite direction of the fluid flow.
Both Step and Isocratic modes of SMBC operation have produced high target protein recovery and purity. Figure 3 shows the purification of histidine-tagged human enolase and annexin-1 from bacterial lysates using both methods. In this example the Isocratic Mode product (annexin 1) was > 95% pure, and the Step Mode product (enolase) 90% pure as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis.
| A. Annexin-1, Isocratic SMBC B. Enolase, Step SMBC | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Figure 3. Isocratic and Step SMBC purification of histidine-tagged proteins from bacterial lysates. Histidine-tagged human annexin-1(Panel A) and enolase (Panel B) were expressed in E. coli. Crude bacterial cell lysates were prepared by standard methods and applied to Ni-chelate columns on the Semba Octave System in a 3-2-3 Isocratic (Panel A) and Step (Panel B) SMBC configurations. Panel A, Isocratic Mode fractions. M, Markers 10-225 kDa; Feed, crude E. coli lysate containing recombinant His-annexin 1; P2-P5, Extract fractions containing purified annexin-1; R2-R4, Raffinate. Panel B, Step Mode fractions. M, Markers 10-225 kDa; Feed, crude E. coli lysate containing recombinant His-enolase; P7-P10, Elute fractions containing purified enolase. |
||
Figure 4 shows side-by-side comparisons of three proteins purified using Isocratic Mode SMBC vs. the conventional single column method. In all three cases the Isocratic Mode produced higher purity, with an increase of 7%, 17%, and 25% for human enolase, annexin-1, and PKI-alpha, respectively. Importantly, SMBC Isocratic and Step modes can be effectively combined to obtain concentrated highly purified preparations from feedstocks containing low levels of dilute target protein. Advantages of these SMBC approaches over standard linear or batch procedures include increased throughput, efficiency, and purity.
![]() |
|
| Figure 4.Comparison of Isocratic SMBC and conventional single column purification of histidine-tagged proteins from bacterial lysates. The indicated human histidine-tagged fusion proteins were expressed in E. coli. Crude bacterial cell lysates were prepared by standard methods and applied to Ni-chelate columns on the Semba Octave System in a 3-2-3 Isocratic SMBC configuration and to an identical single column. The single columns were processed manually per manufacturers’ instructions. Sample of Feed and purified products were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Coomassie blue staining. Equivalent amounts of protein were loaded for each pair of purified samples. Lanes are indicated in the legend. Purities were determined by scanning densitometry of separate gels in which 3 different sample loads were run side by side in triplicate. Yield data were obtained from extended Isocratic SMBC runs of enolase and annexin-1. |
The SMBC methods developed for the immobilized metal affinity system can also be applied to other protein purification strategies, including other specific affinity approaches as well as group-specific methods such as ion exchange, hydrophobic interaction, and size exclusion chromatography. Purification of monoclonal antibodies has also been achieved in our laboratory using cation exchange chromatography adapted for SMBC. In this application the sample (Feed) can be derived from ascites fluid, serum or tissue culture supernatant. The principle is similar to Isocratic Mode, where a Desorbent condition is found that differentiates the target protein (antibody) from the contaminants (serum proteins) with respect to its affinity for the solid phase. In the case of ion exchange this can be accomplished by adjustment of pH and salt concentrations (Stein and Kiesewetter, 2007). Isocratic and Step Mode procedures for continuous antibody purification using Protein A or G affinity chromatography can also be utilized with the Semba Octave Chromatography System
| References |
[−] |
Grabski, A. and Mierendorf, R. Continuous purification of histidine-tagged proteins by immobilized metal affinity simulated moving bed chromatography. (manuscript in preparation).
Perrin, S.R. and Nicoud, R.M. (2001) The Use of SMB for the Manufacture of Enantiopure Drug Substances: From Principle to cGMP Compliance. in Chiral Separation Techniques: A Practical Approach, Second Edition (ed. by G. Subramanian), pp. 253-285, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH.
Stein, A. and Kiesewetter, A. (2007) Cation exchange chromatography in antibody purification: pH screening for optimized binding and HCP removal. J Chromatog B 848: 151-158.



